Robyn Fivush, Ph.D., Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of Psychology at Emory University, will present a lecture entitled "Family Stories and Adolescent Identity and Well-being." Dr. Fivush will examine narrative approaches to understanding self and well-being in adolescence, and examine the role of personal stories and intergenerational stories, stories about one's parents, and their parents before them, in helping adolescents to create a sense of self grounded in the past yet situated in the present that provides a core sense of well-being in the world.

Dr. Fivush's visit is co-sponsored by Group Disparities in Development (Human Development), Psychology, and the Bronfenbrenner Life Course Center.

Karene Booker

Charles Brainerd received a Faculty Innovation in Teaching Award for his Memory and Law Technology Enhancement Project. The Memory and the Law course he teaches, HD 3190/6190; LAW 7582, is currently offered in a traditional classroom setting. This project envisions adapting and developing course materials to: enrich the classroom experience of the current course through technology enhancements, create a distance education course in Memory and the Law offered to an expanded student population, and ultimately repurpose the modules and materials for continuing education for attorneys and other professionals. Specifically, the project will: 1) enhance the current course with online materials and activities suitable for both online and hybrid learners; 2) provide distance learning students with course content similar to the materials that those enrolled in the traditional course are provided and 3) make it possible for a self-guided lawyer/judge or other professional learner to choose and benefit from an individual module from the course.

The Faculty Innovation in Teaching (FIT) program is designed to allow faculty to develop innovative instructional technology projects that have the potential to improve the educational process. The program provides faculty with the technical staff and other resources necessary to plan and implement their projects, thus allowing faculty to focus on their pedagogical objectives.

The proposed course technology enhancements will make cutting edge research on memory and the law accessible to a wider student population including students in other universities as well as lawyers, judges, and other professionals. The topic is critical and timely. Most legal testimony and evidence is based on information from human memory, yet legal professionals and others who work with children and adults involved with the legal system are often unaware of the findings from the scientific study of memory. This course translates basic and applied research on memory into recommendations for preserving and evaluating the integrity of evidence in legal settings.

This interdisciplinary project represents collaboration between the Department of Human Development and the Law School and builds on the strength of Cornell’s Law, Psychology, and Human Development Program. Cornell is a leader in a major new pedagogical trend in law to bring empirical evidence into training. Cornell’s Law, Psychology, and Human Development (LPHD) program is at the forefront of the movement toward empirical law and has wide support.

The LPHD program is a trans-disciplinary program for the integration of research and outreach in the social sciences, legal studies, and public policy. It is unique in the country for its emphasis on research. Included are scholars from the fields of developmental psychology, social psychology, organizational behavior, cognitive psychology, anthropology, sociology, and law.

For Further Information

Karene Booker, ktb1@cornell.edu

Wendy M. Williams and Jessica Zulawski

Starting last winter, second-graders in an Ithaca elementary school classroom have enjoyed riveting discussions about how to distinguish good from bad sources of information, the differences between causation and association, and the elements of sound experimental design. While this may sound like material targeted at high school students, the second graders were taught the underlying concepts using age-appropriate teaching modules as part of the ongoing Thinking Like a Scientist (TLAS) project.

TLAS is an ongoing Cornell educational outreach program developed by Human Development professor Wendy Williams. TLAS has many variants, each aimed at teaching critical thinking and reasoning skills to a different group of young people. The underlying goal of TLAS is to train students to use the scientific method to solve problems in their daily lives. One format of TLAS targets under-represented demographic and socioeconomic groups in science—such as African American, Latino, and economically-disadvantaged White students—at the high school level, with the goal of fostering both an interest in science and stronger critical thinking skills. For high school students, the TLAS curriculum includes in-depth classroom discussions focused on the scientific method and how it can be applied to everyday situations.

Elementary students, however, represented new territory for the program. Thus, Williams enlisted Cornell Human Development senior Jessica Zulawski to help design a new variant of TLAS for these younger students. For her honors thesis, Jessica (under the supervision of Williams), translated the high school TLAS lesson plans into a format appropriate for a second-grade classroom. Laurie Rubin, a twenty-year veteran Ithaca teacher who has taught at Beverly Martin as well as Cayuga Heights elementary schools, played a critical role in the development process by providing invaluable input and guidance, and by teaching the TLAS lessons to her class of second graders.

The lesson plans were taught once a week in forty-five minute segments, but Ms. Rubin also reinforced the knowledge gained during this time by reiterating the material during other class time. The six TLAS modules taught by Rubin were titled “What is Science?,” “Define the Problem,” “Know Fact vs. Opinion,” “Weigh Evidence and Make Decisions,” ”Move from Science to Society, ” and finally, an overarching module that tied together all previous material. Examples in these lessons focused on the central theme of the psychology of food and eating behavior. The curriculum involved discussions on the effects of visual cues on appetite, advertising and healthy eating, and how to find good sources of nutrition information.

Improvement in students’ critical thinking skills was measured by rating students’ verbal responses to open-ended questions. Students were tested individually by Jessica, who transcribed their answers. Testing was conducted two months before the program began, just before program inception, and then two months later, at the conclusion of the program, to provide baseline improvement data for the students as well as program-related improvement data. Questions posed to students involved hypothetical children in real-world scenarios common in the students’lives, and the students were asked if the individual in the scenario was exercising “Good thinking” or “Not-so-good thinking,” and why. The responses were scored by two independent raters on a scale of one to five, indicating the students’ level of ability to generalize the scientific method to solve real-world problems.

The results on the effectiveness of the elementary program showed a great deal of promise. On average, students improved in their scores on each question by one full point by the completion of the program, demonstrating a significant increase. This finding suggests that this curriculum could be useful in additional classrooms to improve the critical thinking abilities of other elementary school students, and warrants further exploration of TLAS for young students.

The hope motivating the expansion of TLAS to this younger group of students was that these students would use the critical thinking skills gained through TLAS to become responsible consumers and users of information. Growing up in the information age, these children are surrounded by a vast world of facts and figures, so it is important that they know what information they can and cannot deem reliable. Real-world problem solving means knowing how to sift relevant from irrelevant information and trustworthy from less-trusted sources, with the aim of building solid solutions responsive to multiple aspects of a problem (for example, how to create a healthy lifestyle). The knowledge and abilities these students gained from participating in the TLAS program are a start on their journey toward thinking like a scientist in everyday life.

June Mead

CITY Project Youth

Teen Leaders from the Community Improvement Through Youth (CITY) Project in Broome County marched to the Broome County Court House with CITY Project community partners and other community leaders to shine a light on youth issues and take part in the annual Stand for Children event on June 5. The program started with a march from the Mental Health Association of the Southern Tier to the courthouse lawn, followed by guest speakers, music, and dance performances by youth groups. Nearly 200 young people, parents, youth advocates, and community leaders participated.

CITY Project Youth

President of the Children and Youth Services Council of Broome County, Amy Humphrey said, "These young people are really here to show people that they have a voice that they want to be heard, that they can make a difference and everyone here is supporting that vision.”Stand for Children is an annual event celebrated in communities nationwide. The first Stand for Children took place in Washington, D.C. in 1996. The Stand for Children event calls attention to youth issues and celebrates young people's many contributions to the community. The Children and Youth Services Council of Broome County has sponsored a local Stand for Children each year since in Binghamton.

CITY Project Youth

The Community Improvement Through Youth (CITY) Project uses Cornell Cooperative Extension's 4-H Signature Program, Youth Community Action as a model for promoting civic engagement, workforce preparation, and asset development among at-risk youth (13-18 years old). The CITY Project is a project of Cornell University, Department of Human Development; Cornell Cooperative Extension of Broome County; and Cornell University Cooperative Extension of New York City. The CITY Project is funded by the Children, Youth and Families At Risk (CYFAR) Program, and is supported by Smith Lever funds from the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. The CITY Project gratefully acknowledges the support of a number of community partners and collaborators including Binghamton University Liberty Partnership Program; OASIS After School Program, Endicott; Broome County Youth Bureau; City of Binghamton Youth Bureau. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

For More Information

June P. Mead, CITY Project Director, jm62@cornell.edu.

June Mead

Over 750 people attended the Children, Youth, and Families at Risk (CYFAR) Conference in Baltimore, Maryland May 18-21. CYFAR 2009 keynote speakers included Francesca Adler-Baeder, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University. Her inspiring keynote was entitled What’s love got to do with it? Children’s development in the context of their parents’ relationships. Bonnie Braun, Director of the Center for Health Literacy, University of Maryland gave the 4-H Family Strengthening Distinguished Lecture, Stories from the By-ways of Life: Tales of Hopes, Dreams and Things In-between. Chandra Ghosh Ippen, Associate Research Director of the Child Trauma Research Program, University of California, San Francisco, presented Designing Systems that Match the Needs of Diverse Families: Focusing on Attachment, Culture, and Trauma.

This year’s featured research presentations included Gary Evans, Professor of Human Ecology speaking on The Environment of Childhood Poverty. His presentation examined the role of physical and social factors in the lives of children growing up in poverty, arguing that the confluence of risk factors plays a particularly critical role in children’s lives. Dr. Evans’ research was recently featured in the Washington Post.

The other research presentations at CYFAR 2009 featured Deborah Leong, Professor Emeritus, Director Center for Improving Early Learning, Metropolitan State College of Denver, Self-Regulation and School Readiness: What Neuroscience Tells Us and How to Support its Development in the Early Childhood Classroom; Marc A. Zimmerman, Professor and Chair in the Department of Health Behavior and Health Education in the School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Empowerment Theory and Adolescent Resilience: Applications for Prevention; and Jane D. Brown, Professor, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, From Video Games to Facebook: Teens’ Health and the Media.

In one of the conferences many successes, nearly 100 CYFAR Conference volunteers joined with the neighbors of the Academy of Success, a community center targeting the underserved in Baltimore City, to build a KaBOOM! playground in Baltimore in just one day. This playground will provide a safe, healthy place for children to play and families to gather for years to come. Events also included a tour to the afterschool program at nearby Fort Meade. The Teen Committee organized a special community service project in which conference attendees wrote letters of encouragement to deployed U.S. Military Service Members. Teen conference participants assisted with the Learning Arcade, helping teach adults about integrating technology into their programs.

Keynote and research presentations will be available for online viewing. These web-video talks can be used as a springboard for continuing dialogue about the important challenges being addressed by those working with children, youth and families. June P. Mead is the CYFAR 2009 Conference Program Coordinator and Steve Goggin chairs the CYFAR 2009 Keynote and Research Committee.

For More Information

Conference Proceedings

Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension

Lisa McCabe

A new report summarizes the results of a 3-year study of Universal Pre-kindergarten in rural areas of New York State. The report, Universal Pre-Kindergarten, Early Care, and Education in Rural New York: Research Findings and Policy Implications, was written by Lisa A. McCabe, John W. Sipple, Hope Casto, and Judith Ross-Bernstein. Based on in-depth case studies with rural school districts, as well as analyses of state-wide education and child care data, the report addressed four key issues: 1) Limited early care and education opportunities; 2) Coordination across early education systems and partners; 3) Transportation; and 4) Pre-kindergarten program implementation. Policy recommendations focus on flexibility in funding, technical assistance, transportation assistance, and sustained fiscal investment. This document is intended for parents, citizens and taxpayers; practitioners in both the schools and community-based organizations; and policymakers at the local, state and federal levels. Funding for this work was provided by the Rural Education Advisory Committee (REAC).

Download the Report

Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension

Corinna Loeckenhoff, a new faculty member in the Department of Human Development was awarded an Innovative Research Project Award by the Bronfenbrenner Life Course Center for her research on The Role of Affect in Temporal Discounting Across the Adult Life Span. According to some estimates, almost half of the instances of premature mortality in the U.S. can be traced to problematic personal decisions (e.g., regarding weight management, substance abuse, and risky behavior). Temporal discounting, the tendency to devalue delayed gains and losses relative to immediate ones appears to play an important role in suboptimal choices. However, although such effects are well-documented in younger adults, comparatively little is known about adult age differences in temporal discounting. This makes it difficult to develop personalized interventions to promote advantageous intertemporal choices across the life span. Previous decision-making research further indicates that age groups differ in their relative emphasis on positive versus negative aspects of choices, their ability to forecast future emotional reactions, and the degree of emotional conflict in response to difficult decisions. To date, such age effects have not been studied in the context of temporal discounting.

Loeckenhoff’s studies rely on a set of novel laboratory paradigms designed to assess the role of affect in realistic temporal discounting scenarios involving both monetary and experiential outcomes. By administering these paradigms to people of different ages, the proposed research will (1) contribute to the scarce literature on age differences in temporal discounting (2) extend existing knowledge about the role of affective variables in temporal discounting, and (3) identify the mechanisms at the basis of observed age effects with the goal of developing interventions to optimize choices across the life span.

The research will not only contribute to basic knowledge about age and emotional processing in the context of temporal discounting but also provide concrete guidelines for improving decision making across the life span. To achieve these goals, she will leverage the expertise of Cornell faculty in multiple disciplines as well as the collaborative network and resources provided through CITRA.

Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension

Kimberly Kopko

The Parenting In Context Project, led by Associate Professor Rachel Dunifon and Extension Associate Kimberly Kopko, officially launched the Cornell Cooperative Extension Parent Education Data Collection System this spring. This online, user-friendly system is designed for CCE parent educators to enter data, collected via pre- and post-survey instruments, from participants of parenting programs that are comprised of at least 6 hours of content delivery. CCE parent educators have received training on entering data in the system and this data will be used to examine and report the effectiveness of parent education programs on both the county and statewide levels, to assess the impact of participation in parent education programs on families across New York State, and to inform research on the ways in which parent education programming impacts parenting behavior.

For More Information

Parenting In Context Statewide Data Collection website

Kim Kopko, Extension Associate, (607) 254-6517, kak33@cornell.edu

Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension

June Mead

June P. Mead, Dept. of Human Development, was selected by National 4-H Headquarters to serve on the Advisory Board for the National 4-H Learning Communities Project, focused on one of the 4-H National Learning Priorities: Program Evaluation. The goal of the National 4-H Learning Communities Project is to foster evaluation capacity building among 4-H youth development professionals and staff in four states: Ohio, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia. A report on the project’s findings is due this summer. The advisory board members also plan to present what they have learned about the use of learning circles in building evaluation capacity at the American Evaluation Association Conference 2009 in Orlando, Florida in November. The talk will be entitled: Building 4-H Evaluation Capacity Through Learning Communities: Tales From the National 4-H Evaluation Learning Communities Project.

For More Information

http://www.national4-hheadquarters.gov/comm/NLP_Impact_9-2008.pdf


Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension

June Mead

June P. Mead, Dept. of Human Development, has been invited by National 4-H Headquarters to be part of the 4-H National Science, Engineering, and Technology (SET) Evaluation Instrument Design Team. The team had its first meeting on June 17-19 in Washington, DC.The 4-H SET Evaluation Instrument Design Team was formed by Suzanne Le Menestrel, National Program Leader, Youth Development Research, National 4-H Headquarters and Jill Walahoski, 4-H SET Evaluation Director, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The team is charged with developing two instruments as part of the national SET evaluation funded by the Noyce Foundation. The first instrument is an implementation study that will be used to collect data from institutions regarding their SET plans. The second is the Youth Engagement, Attitudes, and Knowledge Survey that will be used to collect data annually from a nationally representative sample of 4-H youth.

For More Information

June Mead, jm62@cornell.edu

Human Development Today e-News

Human Development Outreach & Extension